If you have already passed Hogwarts Legacy And you are waiting for additions, for example, about Quiddich or about something else, then Avalanche Software Bad news for you. In a conversation with IGN, the developers admitted that while the studio has no plans to engage in DLC for a magical adventure.
According to the game director Alana t (Alan tew), the team was too busy preparing Hogwarts Legacy to release, so no one even thought about expansion. "We have completely devoted ourselves to the production of the game, so at the moment we have no plans for DLC", – said the leader.
Maybe, Avalanche it is in no hurry to make additions, since first it is necessary to release working versions "Heritage" for PS4, Xbox One and Nintendo Switch.
Be that as it may, the studio has already coped with the main task – to create a solid game on the Harry Potter universe, which has collected a large audience. In Steam alone, peak online adventures exceeded the bar of 879 thousand people. Besides, Hogwarts Legacy showed the best start among Potterian games in the UK and has become the largest release in Europe since the time Red Dead Redemption 2, except for the series FIFA And Call of Duty.
Recall, "Heritage" already available on PC, PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series. Today on consoles Sony A patch was released, who had previously visited the other two platforms. It improved the performance and stability of the game, as well as corrected the problem with obtaining a “Collective publication” trophy.
February 18, 2023 The port is good, but there are nuances – the conclusions of Digital Foundry about Rogalika Roturnal
February 18, 2023 74 million defeated cars and 4 million hours in flight – statistics for the anniversary of Horizon Forbidden West
Hogwarts Legacy
The best comments
The only condition is completed. But not victory. In theory, you can win by points. just a caught low one and 150 points give. T.e, to win the points, you need the team to lead more than 150 points, and then the catcher from the enemy team dull and caught Snitch)
But the question arises – why does the enemy catcher need to catch Snitch if his team loses more than 150 points? He must drive another catcher from Snitch, and not to catch it himself until the team scores his glasses.
In short, Quiddich is continuous nonukgamblingsites.co.uk/ holes with the rules invented by the rules stupidly to be spectacular.
I may not understand something, but in the original source Quiddich is a rather strange game. It’s completely unclear to me, the fuck in the game is a bunch of people, various balls and rings, if the game ends when the catcher of one of the teams is enough Snitch? Moreover, this seems to be the only condition for the victory and completion of the game, despite the account. The book has a mention of a match that has lasted something like several months.
For once, they released a game that was not drunk on DLS, while very high-quality and popular, and there are still people who complain where my dls. Everything is good with your head?
In Hogvats, everything can kill you. This is the main rule of the school
No, it doesn’t look like that. Quiddich is a very heavy garbage in terms of implementation, while it did not rest for many people, they came to play RPG, not magical fifa.
Being a sports discipline, this is a very fan thing. He did not rest in the game at all, and if he will never continue, I will never upset him. Better let the plot quests and new locations be sure.
It was planned as some kind of drop dead argument? But to draw pictures with effectors is not the same thing as to realize Quiddich, local flight mechanics on a broomstick generally looks sluggish as a base for this game. Also, I missed the whole Gwint in a witcher.
But she could sign up for online courses from Skil. "And master the profession of the future.
Finally, the finished play on the release, it lifted up to wait for all the DLS
Yes, in Kursk about 150 points, I did not want to stretch the post. You thought everything correctly.
I still had a lot of questions for the safety of students. Harry, for example, at the age of 12 they took to fly in heaven, despite the fact that 2 goals specially strive to knock down the players from the snowstorms, and the rivals do not mind helping them. And for walking at night at school children are punished with a campaign (naturally night) in a forbidden forest with wild animals, monsters, dark ruler and hell knows who else. Moreover, not to say that they are strongly looking after them.
276 points to Gryffindor for such observation!
We began to forget ..
But the question arises – why does the enemy catcher need to catch Snitch if his team loses more than 150 points? He must drive another catcher from Snitch, and not to catch it himself until the team scores his glasses.
If your team loses 16+ goals, then you need to drive the catcher until it breaks into 14 heads? But does not mean a gap of 16+ goals that which are clogging in this command to put it mildly not very? The fishing of the Snitch with a team losing 160+ points is made mainly to stop the game. For example, this was the reason, according to the observers, for the capture of Snitch Kram in the final of the World Cup in the “Cup of Fire”. He saw his team losing, and the capture of Snitch at that moment was the only way to finish the match with a non -treasure. At Hogwarts, the winner of the Quiddich championship is determined not by the number of victories, but by the number of points earned. And it turns out that the team that loses 160+ points should take the risk that this gap can still increase, and the enemy’s catcher can somehow manage to catch Snitch and add another 150 points, for the sake of the illusory capabilities? And it turns out that on one side you have a loss, for example, 20 points, and on the other a loss of 320+ points, but with a low probability of winning 10 points. Therefore, they choose a loss of 20 points that can be played in other matches.
And the review on this creation is planned ?
The key word "so far". You can tolerate another one for the sake of good addition, as in the good old.
Just Joan Rowling is not a game designer 🙂
Or half a year, "stone hearts", for example, did so much.
That’s right. The game probably paid off powerfully, so why move ahead of time, while the life -giving stream of "greenery" has not yet dried up?
